Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWampServer vs PamPam
When comparing WampServer vs PamPam, the Slant community recommends WampServer for most people. In the question“What are the best php localhost servers?” WampServer is ranked 4th while PamPam is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose WampServer is:
You can Install packages for differents releases of Apache Web Server, MySQL, MariaDB or PHP in order to have the latest releases of them.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Ultra customizable releases of Apps and Services
You can Install packages for differents releases of Apache Web Server, MySQL, MariaDB or PHP in order to have the latest releases of them.
Pro Customizable app menu items
You can customize the App menu Items for launch your local Website(s) in your prefered browser or even in alternatives http ports.
Pro Easy VirtualHost creation
Virtual hosts can be created at the click of a button
Pro Open source
Pro Run both 32bit and 64bit systems
Because it's text-based and developed by powershell.
Pro Folder structure is clear
Pro Intuitive interface
Because its very focus is on basic features.
Pro Fast to start and stop services in 3-5 seconds
Pro Enable Virtual Host and SSL default
Pro Only a language and lightweight (< 100KB)
Useful to understand and customize it.
Pro Separate your data and server data
You can change dir of your data, make it more portable, save your data safer when you upgrade and move.
Pro Version switching
You can add more package versions, so you can switch between versions.
Pro Text-Based
All files are plain text, so they're understandable and modifiable. You can upgrade and build other versions yourself.
Pro Portable
You can move it around to other locations or machines, and it still runs normally.
Cons
Con phpMyadmin does not work
phpMyadmin cannot be accessed either without password or with root and blank password.
Con It's hard to configure VHOSTS
There's no easy way for creating or edit VHOSTS configs.
Con Hard to find documentation
No English manual available on the main website.
Con It's hard to configure VHOSTS
There's no easy way for creating or edit VHOSTS configs.
Con No built-in packages
You need to manually add zip versions of packages, but you can always update latest version of packages when you want, not depending on the maker of the stack.
Con It's very new so it has some unknown and unpredictable bugs
You can debug and fix it yourself though.
Con No documentation
But it does not take long time to learn to use.
Con Setup process is not too easy for new users
Con Only for Windows
But you can customize it for other OSs.
Con Very basic features
- Change versions of packages
- Change dir your data or server data
- Start or Stop services
- Add virtual host
- Add PHP dir and MariaDB dir to user environment path
Con Very basic stack (Apache, MariaDB, PHP)
Supports not a lot of software out of the box. If you want more, you need to upgrade it yourself. Fortunately, it's all in plain text, so you can.
