Here’s the Deal

PyCairo vs pygame

10 0

320 35

When comparing PyCairo vs pygame, the Slant community recommends pygame for most people. In the question“What are the best drawing libraries for Python?” pygame is ranked 1st while PyCairo is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose pygame is:

Pygame uses Python as its scripting language. Python is widely considered one of the easiest languages to grasp even for beginners.

Specs

No specs yet!

LicenseLGPL

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best drawing libraries for Python?

Pros

Pro
Good tutorials and documentation

With a plethora of documentation on the core Cairo library and the bindings for Python, users will be able to turn to the documentation, API, or translate examples from other languages to work with PyCairo.

Pro
Supports rich set of platforms

Support includes Linux, BSDs, Microsoft Windows, and OS X. With all these supported platforms the PyCairo library will be able to complete the job.

Pro
Easy Python syntax

Pygame uses Python as its scripting language. Python is widely considered one of the easiest languages to grasp even for beginners.

Pro
Very easy to understand

The API is very straightforward.

Pro
Good canvas system

Pygame has a drawing system that allows the user to create and draw on an unlimited number of canvases.

Ad
Cons

Con
No 3D support

Due to PyCairo being built off the 2D graphics library cairo, there is no 3D support for any graphics.

Con
Deathly slow

Con
Nonexistent community

No good forums, wiki, or other ways to reach other Pygame developers.

Con
Very basic

Pretty much just a wrapper for SDL.

Con
Pygame is a multimedia framework, not a game engine

Physics, AI and networking are not supported.

Con
Messy documentation

The docs are messy, and some basic functions are infuriating to work out. There's even some places in the documentation where it's clearly wrong about how a method is called/what the arguments really do.