When comparing Skygear vs Para, the Slant community recommends Para for most people. In the question“What are the best self-hosted BaaS (backend-as-a-service) providers?” Para is ranked 11th while Skygear is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Para is:
Powered by Elasticsearch or Lucene.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Raw data is exportable
Pro Supports User authentication
Pro Supports Cloudcode
Pro Rich SDK support
Skygear has SDKs for iOS, Android, JavaScript.
Pro Scalable Backend
Pro Full-text search
Powered by Elasticsearch or Lucene.
Pro Modular
Para offers interfaces for persistence, search and caching. Easy to write your own plugins to implement any of these interfaces.
Pro Open source
Licensed under Apache 2.0.
Pro REST API
Exposes a REST API secured by AWS Signature Version 4.
Pro Multi-tenant
Each tenant has its own database table, search index, and cache.
Pro Integrated metrics
Each tenant receives its own complete metrics for all CRUD and REST operations.
Pro Resource permissions with 3rd party security integrations
Object-level permissions with authentication through LDAP and 3rd party providers such as Google, Facebook, etc.
Pro Easy to use
By far the easiest to use BaaS platform.
Cons
Con No implementation of locking
Last-write-wins.