When comparing NoScript vs Cock.li, the Slant community recommends NoScript for most people. In the question“What are the best tools/apps/extensions to help keep my data private?” NoScript is ranked 13th while Cock.li is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose NoScript is:
NoScript preemptively blocks all plugins (JavaScript, Java, Flash, etc.), and the users can choose and whitelist the websites that they trust to execute those plugins.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Allows plugins to be executed on trusted sites only
NoScript preemptively blocks all plugins (JavaScript, Java, Flash, etc.), and the users can choose and whitelist the websites that they trust to execute those plugins.
Pro Allows registration through Tor and VPN
Pro Support for IMAP/SMTP
Pro Obscene domains
There are many domains to choose from, and just about all of them are memes and nsfw.
Cons
Con Anti-user UI
...hard to set...whitelist Google, Facebook, and many more and you cannot customize that because is coded deep in core scripts...
Con Only available for mozilla-based browsers
Con Obscene domains
There are many domains to choose from, and just about all of them are memes and nsfw.
Con Invite needed
You need to be invited by another Cock.li user.
