Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Iridium vs w3m, the Slant community recommends Iridium for most people. In the question“What are the best web browsers for UNIX-like systems?” Iridium is ranked 12th while w3m is ranked 25th.
Specs
Based OnChromium
Browser EngineBlink
Default Search EngineQwant
LicenseOpenSource (3-clause BSD)
PlatformsWindows, macOS, GNU+Linux
No specs yet!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
Pros
No pros yet!
Pro Support for several elements not found in terminal browsers
Although w3m is primarily a text-based web browser which runs inside the terminal, it supports and renders several elements which other terminal-based browsers cannot like images, tables, tabs or frames.
Pro Available as emacs plugin
W3m can also be downloaded as an emacs plugins to be used as a fast web browser that runs inside emacs.
Cons
No cons yet!
Con Steep learning curve
Being a terminal web browser w3m has a certain learning curve because you need to learn the keystrokes and different commands.
