Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Polar M600 vs Garmin Vivoactive HR, the Slant community recommends Polar M600 for most people. In the question“What are the best fitness trackers?” Polar M600 is ranked 14th while Garmin Vivoactive HR is ranked 19th.
Specs
No specs yet!
AccelerometerYes
AltimeterYes
ClockYes
GLONASSYes
GPSYes
Max Battery Life5 days
Thickness11.43 mm
TouchscreenYes
WaterproofYes
Weight47.6 g
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
Pros
Pro Fast GPS
Pro Waterproof
Suitable for swimming.
Pro With Android Wear 2
Pro Good display
The fitness tracker has a large backlit full-color touch-display that's sunlight-readable and responsive.
Pro Easy to use
The fitness tracker has two buttons, a back button that also locks the device and a start button that also enters settings, and an intuitive touch interface that is controlled with swipes and taps. The learning curve is close to nonexistant.
Pro Step, stairs, heart monitoring
Cons
Con No native continuous heart rate monitoring
Curable with 3rd party apps such as Cardiogram.
Con HR monitoring does not work during swimming
The fitness tracker's heart rate monitoring gets turned off during swimming.