When comparing Ammonite Shell vs Xonsh (The Xonsh Shell), the Slant community recommends Xonsh (The Xonsh Shell) for most people. In the question“What are the best Bash replacements?” Xonsh (The Xonsh Shell) is ranked 3rd while Ammonite Shell is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Xonsh (The Xonsh Shell) is:
Xonsh uses a syntax which is a superset of Python 3.4 plus some additional shell primitives. Because of the similarity to Python, which is famously an easy to understand programming language, the syntax of Xonsh is pretty easy to grasp too, even more so for Python programmers.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Powerful
Can call any 3rd party executable or use any Maven library.
Pro Easy to automate any task
When bash scripts start being complex, they can be converted to Ammonite.
Pro Tab completion
Pro Well documented
Pro Easy to understand, Python-like syntax
Xonsh uses a syntax which is a superset of Python 3.4 plus some additional shell primitives. Because of the similarity to Python, which is famously an easy to understand programming language, the syntax of Xonsh is pretty easy to grasp too, even more so for Python programmers.
Pro Extensible
Most parts of xonsh are extensible. You can change tab-completer, prompt, history backend, aliases, functions and pack it to special package (called "xontrib") and put it on Github. The logic are clear and documented well.
Pro Portable
The xonsh shell has AppImage that makes it Linux-portable.
Pro Command history on steroids - including output
Xonsh has one feature that can be considered particularly unique. It stores not just the commands you type, but their output, and doing a search on your history (configurably) can search the output as well.
Pro Cross platform support
Xonsh has native cross-platform support.