When comparing StickyPassword vs pass, the Slant community recommends pass for most people. In the question“What is the best cross-platform password manager?” pass is ranked 3rd while StickyPassword is ranked 25th. The most important reason people chose pass is:
As it has both Git support and encrypts passwords to GPG-encrypted text files, it is really simple to access everywhere. You can either use a self-hosted or a personal cloud hosted Git repository. It is automatically being kept up-to-date. Clients for pretty much everything and a really active community. Even if you can't run a client you will still be able to access the password by decrypting them from the Git store.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro USB version
Credentials can be stored on a USB drive or external hard drive.
Pro Supports multiple accounts per website
Pro Allows saving notes
You can use notes for sensitive data like security questions and answers.
Pro Nobody except you knows your master password
Pro Will show you weak passwords
Pro Desktop only version can story passwords locally
The desktop only version of Sticky Password ensures that passwords are only stored locally.
Pro Offline access
Pro Multifactor authentication
Sticky has multiple methods of authentication, including fingerprint identification, bluetooth device recognition, and USB authentication where credentials are stored on the USB drive and accessed with a PIN.
Pro Free mobile app
The $19.99 yearly fee provides access to the desktop version as well as the app.
Pro Cross-platform syncing
Sticky Passord syncs across all Windows, Android, and iOS devices. Less popular platforms like BlackBerry OS 10, Kindle Fire, and Nokia X are also supported.
Pro Pulls usernames and passwords from browsers
Sticky password will import credential information stored in browsers for a fast transition between services.
Pro WiFi synchronization
WiFi synchronization over own network.
Pro Forms that don't get recognized to fill automatically can be set up manually
Pro Can add notes about websites
Pro Can save password for apps
Pro Environmentally conscious
For each new user, Sticky Password donates $12 per year to protect Florida Manatees.
Pro Offers a lifetime license
Pro Can automatically back up your vault
You can rollback anytime to a previous version of your vault to recover your account information.
Pro Expires password feature
A feature that can notify you when you need to change a password.
Pro Automatic website registration
SUSSY BAKA
Pro Offers a year of service for free
BALLS
Pro Supports fingerprint authentication
Sticky Password offers fingerprint authentication to Android and iOS devices equipped with a fingerprint scanner.
Pro Easy to use password generator
Pro Optional automatic website logins
You can optionally set Sticky Password to automatically log you in once you open a webpage.
Pro Can save bookmarks
Pro Supports biometric authentication

Pro Ultra portable
As it has both Git support and encrypts passwords to GPG-encrypted text files, it is really simple to access everywhere. You can either use a self-hosted or a personal cloud hosted Git repository. It is automatically being kept up-to-date. Clients for pretty much everything and a really active community. Even if you can't run a client you will still be able to access the password by decrypting them from the Git store.

Pro Free and open source

Pro Works in command line
And is basically just a bunch of GPG-encrypted files stored in a folder.

Pro Full control
You are not forced to rely on any other service provider than yourself. Like saving them on a remote server as in the case of LastPass. You don't have to extend your trust (to LastPass or any other provider).
Pro Has cross platform GUI clients
It has a Qt-based GUI, an Android and iOS app, a Firefox plugin, a Golang GUI app, an interactive CUI, a dmenu script, OS X integration, and also an Emacs package.

Pro Not using a database
It doesn't use a database like, for example, KeePass and thus doesn't open all passwords at once. Just one at a time.
Pro Scripts for importing passwords from different services
Pro Has git support
Pro Allows storing password history
You can version-control the encrypted files using Git, which allows you to track all changes done.
Pro Adheres to Unix philosophy
Does one thing and does it well.
Pro Uses standard components
As GPG and Git are widely used, it relies on thoroughly tested and secure functionality.
Pro Multi user suppport
You and your team can share a repo and different subtrees can be encrypted for different sets of GPG ids.
Pro Support for extra functionality via plugins
For example the plugin "pass-extension-tail" makes it possible to only display the non-password parts of a password file, like the username or the name of the service the password is needed for, and without showing the password.
Pro Minimal
It's very easy to understand what the program does, why it's doing it, and how it's secure.
Cons
Con No Linux support
Con Lack PIN unlocking on desktop
Unlocking the desktop application (at least in Windows) lacks simple PIN unlocking. The other options are interesting, but not as PIN for most users.
Con Passwords that aren't linked to URL or executables are manage with memos (notes)
The way Sticky Password manage passwords that are free of URL or applications isn't obvious. It necessary to write these in memos. Memos are managed in a way where it's too easy to modify them by mistakes. You could end up with a broken password...
Con Not user-friendly
Some features like capture of login into a web page are really simple and most of the time really efficient too. But, as soon as a login scheme become a bit complex, handling exception will causes killing headaches to common users. That's only one exemple, but there's many situations where that super cool passwords managers totally needs to be redesign.
Con Not super user friendly
Might be a little too low-level (even with GUIs) for some teams of users.
Con Exposes the names of the sites
By default each file is named 'google.com.gpg' - so someone who steals your password directory would know every site you have accounts on.
Can be mitigated with plugins like Tomb, but a noteworthy caveat.
Con Not hosted = not accessible
As everything is stored locally, there's no way to access your passwords while on public computers, etc. without exposing your private key to the world. You'll have to manually enter your passwords while looking at your phone, etc.
Con Not ideal if you have to use Windows
While windows clients technically exist, this program is quite obviously aimed at UNIX-like systems. If you have to use Windows (eg. for work) then it'll be difficult to get everything set up properly.
Con No webapp for easy shared access
