When comparing Kweb vs N2O, the Slant community recommends N2O for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” N2O is ranked 29th while Kweb is ranked 46th.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro No need to deal with complex JavaScript toolchain
With Kweb you work in Kotlin from the server, using your favorite Kotlin/Java tools. Kweb integrates and supports popular JavaScript frameworks like Semantic UI. No need to worry about WebPack, cross-compilation, ES6/ES7/React/Angular etc.
Pro Automatic server-side rendering to accelerate initial page render
Pro Handles state end-to-end, bind the DOM directly to DB state and it will stay in sync automatically
Pro Written in Kotlin, a modern, powerful, and fast-growing programming language
Pro Automates communication between browser and server
Pro Fast binary data
Pro Binary encoding and protocols
Here is a list of types of endpoints which are supported by EMQ and accesible to N2O apps: WebSockets, MQTT, MQTT-SN, TCP, UDP, CoAP. Normal use of N2O as a Web Framework or a Web Application Server is through WebSockets, but for IoT and MQTT applications it could be served through UDP or SCTP protocols providing application level message delivery consistency.
Cons
Con Not yet 1.0.0, still in beta and under active development
Con Unfriendly developer community
Developers are often rude and unfriendly to users.
Con Bad documentation
It has bad documentation, which leaves out crucial steps, making it hard to learn.