Here’s the Deal

Database .NET vs SchemaCrawler

2 0

8 0

When comparing Database .NET vs SchemaCrawler, the Slant community recommends SchemaCrawler for most people. In the question“What are the best database design programs?” SchemaCrawler is ranked 9th while Database .NET is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose SchemaCrawler is:

The text-based output serves for database documentation, and is designed to be diff-ed against other database schemas.

Specs

PlatformsWindows

Technology.NET

PlatformsWindows, Linux, Mac

TechnologyJava

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best database design programs?

Pros

Pro
Portable

Pro
Multiple databases

Supported databases:

SQL Server
SQL Azure
LocalDB
MySQL
Oracle
IBM DB2
Informix
PostgreSQL
HP Vertica
NuoDB
Teradata
Sybase ASE
Firebird
SQLite
SQLCe
Access
Excel
VistaDB
dBase
FoxPro
OleDB
ODBC
OData
Text
NoSQL

Pro
Many options for output formats in addition to graphical

The text-based output serves for database documentation, and is designed to be diff-ed against other database schemas.

Pro
Extensive and detailed documentation online

Including visuals of the results of command-line option usage.

Pro
Free

Ad
Cons

No cons yet!

Con
Need Java

Con
Does not work with schema dumpfiles

SchemaCrawler has no methods for dealing with when you only have a schema generated via something like (mysqldump --no-data [options] >schema-only_dump.sql) , and do not currently have access to a live database to connect with.