When comparing Expense Manager Pro vs SmartAmount, the Slant community recommends SmartAmount for most people. In the question“What are the best personal finance tracker apps for Android? ” SmartAmount is ranked 18th while Expense Manager Pro is ranked 30th. The most important reason people chose SmartAmount is:
SmartAmount has interesting original features, like future fund prediction.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cloud backup
Users can backup the apps info to Dropbox, Drive and the external memory.
Pro Take pictures of receipts
Users can take photos of their receipts.
Pro Multiple accounts
Expense Manager Pro can handle multiple accounts.
Pro Original
SmartAmount has interesting original features, like future fund prediction.
Pro Simple
Unlike other money focused apps, this one is very simple to use and can be learned in few minutes.
Pro Requires only a small bit of time
Users can initially add all recurring incomes and expenses to have a rough estimate. If users forget to register occurrences for long period of time, that is not an issue as all that needs done is for the user to set their current amount and the app will adapt all of its charts and statistics.
Pro Secure
All data is encrypted, and there is a built in user set password.
Pro World-wide availability and currency support
App is available in all world countries, and supports all world currencies.
Pro Chart to see your FUTURE balance
You can easily see how next expenses change your future money availability. You can see it graphically (by chart), or through calendar view
Pro Backup and restore
You can backup in text format (JSON) so you really OWN your data, and you can read it directly from file, if needed
Cons
Con Design leaves something to be desired
The design of the app follows zero of Googles design guidelines. Not only does it not take advantage of most of the screens real-estate, the text itself is pretty small.
Con Unstable
App last updated January 2017, which is causing issues with Google Play Services repeatedly crashing.