Here’s the Deal

qemacs (for quick emacs) vs neovim-gtk

2 1

2 0

When comparing qemacs (for quick emacs) vs neovim-gtk, the Slant community recommends qemacs (for quick emacs) for most people. In the question“What are the best terminal text editors?” qemacs (for quick emacs) is ranked 15th while neovim-gtk is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose qemacs (for quick emacs) is:

Including e.g. Chinese.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best terminal text editors?

Pros

Pro
Input methods for most (human) languages

Including e.g. Chinese.

Pro
Terminal and graphics mode

Supports the terminal mode with 'qemacs -nw' and a graphics mode.

Pro
Good documentation and help

Context sensitive shortcut help on F1.
Good online documentation.

Pro
Comfortable file browser

Easy to open and manage files (dired-mode).

Pro
Supports many editing modes besides text

Hex
HTML / CSS
Image
Audio/video (maybe not the most sought after mode in a text editor, but, well, it's there)

Pro
Full UTF-8 support

Including bi-directional writing.

Pro
Super lightweight and fast

Pro
Emacs like key-bindings

Use your muscle memory if you know Emacs already.

Pro
Full GTK3 integration

The UI is fully GTK3 compatable, so it themes to match your desktop and the functions are all in expected locations.

Pro
Light UI stays out of the way but does provide all expected widgets

The overall UI is very trim and doesn't take up screen space for no reason, but all the expected bits like tabs and popups and even the command line have native widgets.