When comparing fenixwebserver vs Laragon, the Slant community recommends Laragon for most people. In the question“What are the best php localhost servers?” Laragon is ranked 2nd while fenixwebserver is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Laragon is:
Laragon starts fast - instantly. All services in Laragon are compiled to native code so they run fast - much faster than Docker & Virtual Machines. Laragon uses its own service manager so all services also start quickly & parallelly.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Well Designed
Pro CLI tools
Pro Share sites online
Develop locally, share online through localtunnel with a simple mouse click.
Pro Beautiful Interface
Visually manage local sites.
Pro Easy to use
Click to fire up/kill static web servers. Auto-detects available ports.
Pro Fast and powerful
Laragon starts fast - instantly. All services in Laragon are compiled to native code so they run fast - much faster than Docker & Virtual Machines.
Laragon uses its own service manager so all services also start quickly & parallelly.
Pro Supports many databases
Such as MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB.
Pro Easily add new PHP version
Pro Very fast and lightweight
Pro Auto SSL
You can move the Laragon folder around (to other disks, laptops, sync to Cloud, etc.) without any worries.
Pro Easily add new Node.js version
Pro Pretty URLs
Work with your "app" using this nice, short, beautiful url: http://app.test
The core binary itself is less than 2MB and uses less than 4MB RAM when running.
Pro Linux support
You can install laragon in linux with the help of wine software.
Pro Great community support
Con Not a PHP Server Stack
It's listed in the developer's on FAQ's that this application is NOT a PHP development suite. Why is this on the list?
Con Windows Only
Con Not intuitive
Con Difficult to install laragon in Linux
You can install laragon in linux also with the help of wine software but it is difficult to install.