When comparing Duplicati vs restic, the Slant community recommends restic for most people. In the question“What are the best de-duplicating backup cli programs for Linux?” restic is ranked 2nd while Duplicati is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose restic is:
restic runs comfortably as a CLI program, which allows for batch mode processing and integration in scripts or system services.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free
Pro Open Source
Pro Cross-platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS)
Pro Works with standard protocols and many services
FTP, SSH, WebDAV as well as popular services like Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon Cloud Drive & S3, Google Drive, box.com, Mega, hubiC and many others.
Pro Simple interface
Pro Command-line program
restic runs comfortably as a CLI program, which allows for batch mode processing and integration in scripts or system services.
Pro Deduplication
Uses deduplication of content based on slices of files; if you only change one line, you'll only have to back up the small slices in which they are contained.
Pro Encrypted backups
Easily encrypt your backups using AES256.
Pro Very fast
Pro Simple command calls
Cons
Con Doesn't support imaging
Con File backup program which is not intended for system restore
Con No built-in automation
Many backup tools come with some form of built-in scheduling, which is absent from restic.