When comparing Chrome SSH Extension vs mRemoteNG, the Slant community recommends Chrome SSH Extension for most people. In the question“What are the best SSH clients for Windows?” Chrome SSH Extension is ranked 13th while mRemoteNG is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Chrome SSH Extension is:
Despite being a browser extension, you can use the SSH App without Internet connection.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Runs offline
Despite being a browser extension, you can use the SSH App without Internet connection.
Pro Simplistic, minimalist interface
Easy to add and save connections. Once saved, just double click connections that you want to use, then off you go with your thing!
Pro It's free
Open source.
Pro Import/Export feature
Allows to share connections.
Pro Can open multiple sessions in different tabs
Pro Connection manager
Lets you organize your connections into folders with icons as well and allows nested folders as well.
Pro Supports multiple protocols
RDP (Remote Desktop/Terminal Server)
VNC (Virtual Network Computing)
ICA (Citrix Independent Computing Architecture)
SSH (Secure Shell)
Telnet (TELecommunication NETwork)
HTTP/HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol)
rlogin
Raw Socket Connections
Pro Inheritance from folder properties
Inheritance makes it possible to store properties on folder basis and let the underlying connections inherit this info.
Cons
Con You can't disable NaCL
Con Private keys needs to be managed on PuTTY
Since mRemoteNG is integrated with PuTTY (included in the installation), all private key needs to be configured on PuTTY itself and then the PuTTY session needs to be selected on mRemoteNG.