Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
lf vs WCM Commander
When comparing lf vs WCM Commander, the Slant community recommends WCM Commander for most people. In the question“What are the best file managers for UNIX-like systems?” WCM Commander is ranked 27th while lf is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose WCM Commander is:
Has a built-in terminal from which users can run any kind of command.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Pros
Pro Uses a server/client architecture to share file selection between multiple instances
This lets you open lf in two different terminals or tabs and do things like copy something on one terminal to the other.
Pro ranger like ui
Pro Works on Windows
Pro Fast startup and low memory footprint due to native code and static binaries
Pro Single binary without any runtime dependencies except for terminfo database
Pro Configurable with shell commands
Pro Built-in terminal
Has a built-in terminal from which users can run any kind of command.
Pro Virtual file system
WCM Commander has a virtual file system for smb, ftp and sftp.
Pro Built-in editor
WCM Commander has a built-in text editor with syntax highlighting included.
Cons
Con Lacks features
Con File editing on virtual file systems not supported
You cannot edit files in the virtual file system.