Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing brow.sh vs carbonyl, the Slant community recommends brow.sh for most people. In the question“What are the best web browsers that run in a terminal?” brow.sh is ranked 3rd while carbonyl is ranked 6th.
Specs
No specs yet!
Based OnChromium
LanguagesRust + C++
LicenseBsd-3-Clause + None
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
Pros
Pro Works on all sites that Firefox works on
Pro Supports JavaScript
Pro Works with every webpage
It supports all of JS CSS and HTML that chromium does meaning that it can run any web page.
Pro Graphical elements supported
Renders all the web browser elements while still supporting all posix terminals.
Cons
Con Does not save bandwidth
Does not save bandwidth when run on local machine, only on remote machine without bandwidth limit.
Con Very slow
Con Unnecessary
Just as much code as chromium without anything to show for it.