When comparing Tiki vs Quip, the Slant community recommends Quip for most people. In the question“What are the best multi-user wikis?” Quip is ranked 12th while Tiki is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Quip is:
Quip allows for offline editing of documents which then sync upon connection to Wi-Fi. This way users can continuing working while not connected to a data signal, but they can still back up their work when they do finally get one.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro It's a full featured CMS
Tiki supports user-account management, permission management, allows managing menus, customizing layout, etc.
Pro Bitnami stack
Bitnami stack available for Cloud or install as Virtual machine.
Pro Lots of built-in features
Tiki includes tracker, chat, newsletter, forum and much, much more functionality out of the box.
Pro Free and open source
Tiki is licensed under LGPL.
Pro LDAP support
Pro Upgrades are smooth
Because all features of Tiki are supported by core developers, compared to a model where the wiki relies on third-party extensions that may or may not get upgraded along with the core codebase, the upgrades are a lot easier.
Pro Offline editing
Quip allows for offline editing of documents which then sync upon connection to Wi-Fi. This way users can continuing working while not connected to a data signal, but they can still back up their work when they do finally get one.
Pro Amazing mobile interface
Unlike other mobile apps, Quip has really innovated the text editor on mobile, making for a good Evernote alternative. It has a great interface for formatting text that stays out of your road so to maximize how much room you have to type.
Pro Private document sharing
Files can be shared with others via a URL. The owner of the shared document can set it to be in read-only mode or they can allow anyone to edit it. Collaborators don't need to have a Quip account to participate. This feature makes for a great Evernote alternative, for those looking for a different app that has this similar function.
Pro Highly compatible
Quip can export documents to several formats, including .DOC, .PDF, .HTML, as well as a couple of others. This allows for compatibility with a wide selection of other apps.
Cons
Con Can feel bloated
Since there's so much stuff in Tiki already built-in, it can be overwhelming if all you need is a simple wiki.
Con New version has performance issues
…on my old phone. Yes I know my phone is at fault but the old version wasn't annoyingly slow in the Spreadsheet component.
Con Not really free with stringent controls on trial
The trial is content limited which means if you start using it quite a bit they'll pick the perfect moment to swoop in and start charging you. It's better for them because it means they can look at your account and pick the best time to ask you to pay (hey we notice you're using Quip lots and have a new project you just started how about you pay now or you lose everything).
Con Limited formatting on spreadsheets
Within spreadsheet cells, you can't do things like, for example, taking part of the text and aligning it to the center or to the left. Furthermore, in the mobile app, you can't jump to the next line to keep writing inside the same cell.
Con Can't rename files
You can't really rename documents per se in Quip. What you do is put the first line of the document as its title, so that it is displayed on the main list of documents on the app. The program suggests to combine it with a HL (Large Heading) format.