Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Tiny Core Linux vs Bedrock, the Slant community recommends Bedrock for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distros that don't use systemd?” Bedrock is ranked 26th while Tiny Core Linux is ranked 37th.
Specs
Based OnN/A
Default Desktop EnvironmentFLWM
Init-SystemSysV
Release SchedulePoint
OriginUSA
OS FamilyGNU/Linux
Release TypeBinary
Based OnN/A
Default Desktop EnvironmentN/A
Init-SystemN/A
Release ScheduleN/A
CodenamePoki
Current Linux KernelN/A
Last Officially Updated12/27/18
Latest version0.7.1
Official Supported Architecturesx86_64, s390x, ppc, ppc64(le), mips, mips(64)el, i386, i486, i586, i686, armv7(h)l, aarch64
Officially Supported OSesDebian, Devuan, Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Artix Linux, Alpine Linux, CentOS, Exherbo, Fedora, Gentoo, Void
Package ManagerN/A
PriceFree
Version0.7.1
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Pros
No pros yet!
Pro Choose your init system
Pro Choose your package manager
Pro Virtually every pro from every linux distro
Since Bedrock lets you pick and choose the best parts from each distro, every single pro from each distro applies to Bedrock.
Pro Pick and choose what you want from other distros
Want Debian's stable base and Arch's pacman for bleeding edge packages?
Want the security of Qubes OS and Gentoo's portage?
With the correct setup all this can be achieved.
Cons
No cons yet!
Con Often increases boot times
Since Bedrock has to load the strata before handing control to the chosen init system, it can make booting your machine take longer.
Con Difficulty setting up
Bedrock can be challenging to setup properly with the correct strata.