When comparing Checkvist Web Clipper vs Tagpacker, the Slant community recommends Tagpacker for most people. In the question“What are the best alternatives to Evernote Web Clipper to save URLs?” Tagpacker is ranked 6th while Checkvist Web Clipper is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Tagpacker is:
The company earns (enough) money with affiliate links, therefore there is no need for a purchasable pro membership.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Lots of useful features
Pro Keyboard-centric nature
Shortcuts very intuitive.
Pro Keyboard shortcut to invoke clipper
Pro Can specify where to place the stored clip
Pro Clean and minimal interface
Pro Not expensive
Pro A great deal of customizations
Includes CSS tuning for the geeks (or not like).
Pro 100% free (at the moment)
The company earns (enough) money with affiliate links, therefore there is no need for a purchasable pro membership.
Pro Auto tagging
It makes tag suggestions based on your tags already used
Pro Follows strict privacy rules
Because it is located in Germany, the company has to follow very strict rules regarding privacy.
Pro Automate tasks with Zapier
Automating tasks with Zapier.
Pro API
Programatically access links and tags.
Pro Clean, efficient UI
Pro Date
It saves the date when the bookmark is added
Cons
Con It is a URL and notes list manager, NOT a clipper
Con Uses affiliate links, which can be seen as an invasion of privacy
Affiliate links are usually not only a way to earn money with advertisement. They also include generating user profiles, which could be seen as a big privacy issue.