Garuda Linux vs Archcraft

Uses vram, and a zen kernel.

The dr460nized KDE theme is awesome.

Filled to the brim with lots of quality-of-life changes and optimizations that are simple enough for long-time Windows, long-time Mac users, and Arch newbies to understand. Though, it also leads to bloat or not necessarily helpful extra software. If you're not into the "bloat" added in, try checking out the barebones version, you'll need to know a lot of things bout Arch to fully use barebones.

You already have most of the customization done for you out of the box.

It takes just a bit more RAM than Manjaro. Edit: This statement is only true if it helps the user and since this could be running on a low end machine this will not.

One of the prettiest distros out there IMHO.

Easy to follow guides for newbies or those who want a little guidance.

In my opinion, Pacman is a better choice than apt. Perhaps Linux Distros should consider migrating.

The dev is very active & is constantly improving the distro. New ISOs released regularly.

The dev made this one of the best Distros and easy to add/remove deesktops or wm without breaking the system.

The effort and work put in is evident, doesn't look finished half way

The developers made sure this distro was crafted well. Really nothing I would change, and the default ensure you won't be installing malware.

The Site is informative and gives a nice insight into what you can expect from this beautiful distro. For the first time ever for me no customization needed everything is perfect.