to the 
Slant community chat on Discourse| 11 Recommended Products | Recommendations | Based On | Default Desktop Environment | Release Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 KDE Neon· · · | 44 | 13 | – | – | – |
| #2 Manjaro· · · | 28 | 12 | Arch | XFCE, KDE, or GNOME | Rolling Release |
| #3 Chakra· · · | 9 | 1 | – | – | – |
| #4 Arch· · · | 7 | 3 | Arch | None | Rolling Release |
| #5 Fedora· · · | 3 | 0 | Fedora | Gnome Shell | 6 Months |
| #6 openSUSE· · · | 15 | 12 | openSUSE | KDE | 12 Months |
Pro Frequent bug fixes
Rolling release with fixes every few weeks instead of the traditional model of waiting months (or a year+) for a new release.
Pro Solid core, latest features
Uses the stable Ubuntu long-term release as its core, packaging the hottest software fresh from the KDE Community.
Pro Based on Ubuntu
It is based on the rock solid base of Ubuntu and all the goodness of KDE.
Con Barebones install
Not a very significant con, but it could have a bit more installed by default (LibreOffice, etc) to make it more usable out of the box. Luckily, if you're missing something you need you can easily install it from the software center.
Pro Excellent support
Arch wiki is one of the richest and most plethoral linux community. On top of that, you also have Manjaro's community. Rolling-distro compared to KDE Neon.
Pro The best cutting edge package base for rapidly developing Plasma
Manjaro that is built on Arch Linux has a minimalistic and future-proof KDE edition.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Con BECAUSE KDE plasma 5 is bad joke, work for work ?
Chakra Do not save bad and worthless work KDE team ...
Pro Cutting edge rolling release
Latest version of softwares and the OS itself.
Pro As slim or copious as you want it
Arch keeps its core repositories slim and free of unnecessary dependencies. At first installation only a bare system is set up. You can easily get the other applications through the package manager. The repositories are nearly as full as those of Ubuntu, while they are often more up to date. That...
Con Requires expert Linux and command-line knowledge to setup
Going in with zero Linux knowledge is not really recommended when wanting to install Arch, though it can be a good learning experience for those that are dedicated to trial and error as well as reading many faqs.
Con Manual install process
Installing archlinux must be done manually from the command line.
Pro One-click install
Much better system then other distros for installing any package. It is as simple as clicking on one button and typing in your password. Adds a repo to your system keeping everything updated at the same time.
Pro Reliable
The packaging team is dependable resulting in system updates that come in a timely fashion and systems which rarely, if ever, break due to packaging. The versions of software that are selected and the configuration of them is typically extremely high quality.
Con Software resources could use improvement
Its software resources are still a few steps behind the populous Arch User Repository (AUR). Not really a con, but there's room for improvement.
Pro Access to Debian and Ubuntu repositories
Kubuntu has the largest package repositories and arguably the most well-maintained ones in all of desktop Linux, by virtue of being a derivative of Debian and Ubuntu.
Option marked as FlaggedComments
Welcome to the Slant Community
Stop spending hours researching
Slant is written by a community helping you be informed. Let us know what you’re passionate about to get an awesome personalized feed.