When comparing Doom emacs vs Textadept, the Slant community recommends Textadept for most people. In the question“What are the best programming text editors?” Textadept is ranked 16th while Doom emacs is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Textadept is:
Both text and GUI versions behave mostly the same, just the way notepad users would expect it to. Like shift+arrows - select, Ctrl+c - copy, Ctrl+o - open a file.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Very good connection of Vim and Emacs
Vim keybinding, hydra key shows all keys is very easy to learn, is ecosystem you are able to config everything, good support for reference findings of elements, variables,classes, very fast, easy manipulation of frames,buffer, project files, you will forget that mouse exist. Magit -bets client for git. Intellisense.
Pro Includes all you need to start your workflow
Pro Has both GUI and TUI
Both text and GUI versions behave mostly the same, just the way notepad users would expect it to.
Like shift+arrows - select, Ctrl+c - copy, Ctrl+o - open a file.
Pro Cross-platform
It's available for Windows, Mac and Linux.
Pro Small and portable
Has very few dependencies, and very small footprint. Can be copied to a new system in a moment, unpacked and be at your service.
Pro Scriptable
Has a built-in lua engine.
Cons
Con Is dificult to go back to other IDE
I was been forced in company to leave emacs. Generally we were using webstorm but when I show them what this can do, for FREE.
Con Community
Does not have an IRC channel or some kind of forum where a community of developers/plugin writers could evolve around. Has a mailing list which is said to be active but that does not feel that attractive.