Here’s the Deal

Webflow vs Pixpa

66 13

26 4

When comparing Webflow vs Pixpa, the Slant community recommends Webflow for most people. In the question“What are the best WYSIWYG website builders?” Webflow is ranked 3rd while Pixpa is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Webflow is:

Speed & Quality webdesign done in your browser.

Specs

PlatformsWeb

No specs yet!

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best WYSIWYG website builders?

Pros

Pro
Best in it's class

Speed & Quality webdesign done in your browser.

Pro
Semi-collaborative development support

Webflow allows workload to be shared among multiple users. However, you can't leave comments for them.

Pro
W3C-compliant HTML5/CSS3

Webflow generates W3C-compliant markup and stylesheets.

Pro
Responsive web design with Bootstrap

Because it's based on Bootstrap, it works across all modern browsers & devices.

Pro
Unlimited storage and bandwidth

Pixpa offers unlimited storage and bandwidth for your photographs on all the plans.

Pro
Beautiful themes for professional photographers

Pixpa has more than 20 pre-built multipurpose themes for creative pros.

Pro
Allows password-protected galleries

Pro
Integrated blogging

Pro
DIY pagebuilder for creating custom pages

Pixpa offers drag-and-drop functionality for creating custom pages. There are more than 300 pre-built, ready to use content blocks for building a custom webpage on a site.

Pro
12 gallery layouts

Choose from multiple gallery layouts to showcase your work the way you want.

Pro
Responsive websites for mobile

Works on all mobile devices.

Pro
No coding required

Drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to build a professional website.

Pro
Cost-effective

All plans allow unlimited images and bandwidth.

Pro
Fast and secure

All websites are hosted on secure and scalable cloud infrastructure ensuring up-time and fast delivery.

Pro
Easy WYSIWYG editor

The PageBuilder offered by Pixpa is very easy to use and has custom content blocks which can be incorporated in any custom page you build for your website . The Drag and Drop functionality is helps here as well.

Pro
Client proofing

Pixpa allows you to create private galleries for clients. It gets pretty easy for clients to select images and give feedback. The service allows easy workflows.

Pro
Brilliant SEO capabilities

Supports automatic sitemap.xml generation, automatic robots.txt generation, meta data for each page or sub-page on website, SEO friendly URLs, optimized images with proper alt tags and description.

Ad
Cons

Con
Based on Bootstrap

Bootstrap is rather old technology

Con
Design tool is web-based, not a proper application.

The site doesn't state this explicitly.

Con
Can't export your site for deployment unless you pay.

Not unreasonable, but something users should know before investing their time.

Con
Uses JavaScript

Webflow uses JavaScript on its websites. Website visitors can have JavaScript disabled and be unwilling to enable it for the website they want to view, which would put a website created with Webflow out of their reach.

Con
No way to collaborate on designs with comments

Forum post here.

Con
No version control

Forum post here.

Con
Fixed media queries

Webflow has four fixed breakpoints (desktop, laptop, mobile landscape & mobile portrait). The inability to set your own media queries can be limiting. If your layout breaks outside of these four options, you have to export the code and write them yourself.

Con
The web builder currently supports desktop only

Pixpa websites are responsive and work well on all mobile devices. The website builder though is optimized to work on desktops.

Con
Third-party account required for commerce

Unlike many other solution, there's no built-in commerce solution.

Con
Inconvenient website building

No drag and drop or WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editor is available for building the website. All properties have to be set and saved in the backend before it's possible to view the result that in and of itself has to be viewed in a separate browser window. Getting a site just right takes a lot of back and forth between refreshing the preview window and editing details in the backend.