Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariZoomCharts vs D3.js
When comparing ZoomCharts vs D3.js, the Slant community recommends D3.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for creating visualisations of data as charts/graphs?” D3.js is ranked 1st while ZoomCharts is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose D3.js is:
D3.js is a very popular tool with an active community, resulting in plenty of learning resources and fast responses to questions.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Charts-on-Charts
ZoomCharts patented technology called Charts-on-Charts, which allows to dynamically build multiple interactive charts inside one canvas object.
Pro Multi-touch
ZoomCharts is built for mobile devices. All native multi-touch gestures are built in. Data navigation and exploration is as native as it could ever be.
Pro Interactivity
All ZoomCharts products have high level of interactivity available.
Pro Speed & Performance
ZoomCharts are canvas based, as tested with default settings, more than 20 times faster as svg based competitor with same data and default settings. Video available on ZoomCharts youtube channel.
Pro Extensive documentation
Most of ZoomCharts customers do comment that ZoomCharts Documentation is one of the best that they have seen
Pro Fantastic Support
They responded to my issue/question really amazingly fast and that means I didn't have to halt my project development. Also the attitude was great.
Pro Large community
D3.js is a very popular tool with an active community, resulting in plenty of learning resources and fast responses to questions.
Pro Huge number of examples online
Most of the examples provided are by the author, but there's also a great community writing plugins and more examples.
Pro Doesn't require a proprietary framework
D3's emphasis on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework.
Pro Versatile library for manipulating data on the DOM
Pro Very flexible join paradigm
Can be tricky at first, but once learned, data manipulation and binding can easily generate complex visualizations for massive amounts of data.
Pro Great for highly interactive scenes
D3.js offers incredible levels of interactivity.
Pro Backwards compatible
D3.js is intended for modern browsers, so supports IE9 and above (IE8 with an additional library) as well as all the other modern browsers.
Cons
Con Very expensive
Con Steep learning curve
The complexity and flexibility of D3.js results in it being a time-consuming tool to learn for many users.
D3 is incredibly flexible; probably more so than any other JavaScript visualization library at the time of this posting. With that flexibility comes increased complexity. If you just want to create some quick charts you will get results faster with something else.
Con "Selections" are elegant, but somewhat hard to grok
Selections are core to working with D3 beyond the basics. They're powerful and useful, but require new developers to get up to speed (e.g. set aside 30m to read and digest: https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/Selections) and if used in the context of a larger application will result in a portion of the code using different patterns than the rest, requiring a translation layer in between.
