When comparing openSUSE MicroOS vs Garuda Linux, the Slant community recommends Garuda Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best rolling release Linux distributions?” Garuda Linux is ranked 14th while openSUSE MicroOS is ranked 49th. The most important reason people chose Garuda Linux is:
Uses vram, and a zen kernel.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fully-featured desktop suitable for everyday use
Pro Automatic atomic updates via openSUSE transactional updates and snap updates
Pro Based on openSUSE Tumbleweed with excellent up-to-date package library
Pro Minimal OS designed to run snaps and containers
Pro Rolling releases
Pro Super-fast
Uses vram, and a zen kernel.
Pro Themes
The dr460nized KDE theme is awesome.
Pro Easy entrance to Arch Linux
Filled to the brim with lots of quality-of-life changes and optimizations that are simple enough for long-time Windows, long-time Mac users, and Arch newbies to understand. Though, it also leads to bloat or not necessarily helpful extra software. If you're not into the "bloat" added in, try checking out the barebones version, you'll need to know a lot of things bout Arch to fully use barebones.
Pro Highly customized interface
You already have most of the customization done for you out of the box.
Pro Unused RAM is wasted RAM
It takes just a bit more RAM than Manjaro. Edit: This statement is only true if it helps the user and since this could be running on a low end machine this will not.
Cons
Con OS package updates applied on reboot only
Con Needs a lot of RAM
Minimum is 4GB, for most Linux distributions it's 2GB or less.