Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Lumina vs Hyprland, the Slant community recommends Hyprland for most people. In the question“What are the best desktop environments for Arch Linux?” Hyprland is ranked 14th while Lumina is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose Hyprland is:
Animations smoother than you can imagine.
Specs
LicenseBSD 3 clause
Programming LanguageC++
Available OnX11
Main UsageLightweight Qt desktop shell that supports advanced BSD features
Widget ToolkitQt
LicenseBSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
Programming LanguageC++
TypeTiling
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Pros
Pro Low memory footprint
Pro Portability
Pro Smooth
Animations smoother than you can imagine.
Pro Uses wlroots
The best Wayland compositor library built on standards.
Pro Plugins
Has a plugin system.
Pro Beautiful
Pro Easy to customize
Has a nice wiki which makes customizing it very easy.
Cons
Con Horribly sluggish
Slow start times. Unresponsive menu.
Con Depends on QT5, so dependency on large libraries still exists
Con Not as lightweight as it intends to be
Con Early development stages
It has a few bugs and missing features.
Con Difficult setup
It has a lot of dependencies which is difficult to find and build in Debian. Also most dependencies are not found in the system repository.