When comparing Fedora Silverblue vs Archcraft, the Slant community recommends Archcraft for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Archcraft is ranked 68th while Fedora Silverblue is ranked 93rd. The most important reason people chose Archcraft is:
One of the prettiest distros out there IMHO.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Faster reboots when upgrading
Because Fedora Silverblue uses rpm-ostree, upgrades are performed by creating a new "commit" and reboots simply boot into the new commit, making the time to reboot during an upgrade faster than regular Fedora, which applies updates during the reboot.
Pro Minimal & beautiful
One of the prettiest distros out there IMHO.
Pro User friendly install guides on site
Easy to follow guides for newbies or those who want a little guidance.
Pro Pacman more stable
In my opinion, Pacman is a better choice than apt. Perhaps Linux Distros should consider migrating.
Pro Active & responsive dev
The dev is very active & is constantly improving the distro. New ISOs released regularly.
Pro Well organized
The dev made this one of the best Distros and easy to add/remove deesktops or wm without breaking the system.
Pro Worth the Donation
The effort and work put in is evident, doesn't look finished half way
Pro Lovely UI Design with an Attractive menu
The developers made sure this distro was crafted well. Really nothing I would change, and the default ensure you won't be installing malware.
Pro Not just a Website with some Ghostfiles
The Site is informative and gives a nice insight into what you can expect from this beautiful distro. For the first time ever for me no customization needed everything is perfect.
Cons
Con Installing using rpm-ostree is more cumbersome
After updating or changing the installed packages, Silverblue requires a reboot for changes to take effect, unless the experimental apply-live command is used (rpm-ostree ex apply-live).