Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing antiX vs PCLinuxOS, the Slant community recommends antiX for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distros that don't use systemd?” antiX is ranked 13th while PCLinuxOS is ranked 24th. The most important reason people chose antiX is:
Has a 70-90MB memory footprint.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Extremely lightweight
Has a 70-90MB memory footprint.
Pro Quick installation
The installation procedure for antiX is quick and painless. It installs the OS and grub in no time.
Pro Works well on 32-bit PC
Fewer distros are available to work on 32-bit machines. This works well on old Toshiba. Quick enough on older machines not to notice any lagging.
Pro Stats appear on the desktop
Pro Works very well on ASUS 1005HA netbook
Faster than other distros tested, including many on this list.
Pro Software management and updating made simple through Synaptic
Pro The team is headed by Texstar
One of the best in the business.
Pro Rolling release model
No reinstalling the OS after every major upgrade. Keep your OS updated, and you have the latest version.
Pro Helpful and knowledgeable forums
Many issues can be resolved by just searching the forums. They are really a storehouse of knowledge. If not, expert help is still available.
Pro "Batteries included" philosophy
Main release includes most apps needed by users everyday. Windows users will see a familiar look and feel to the UI. H/W issues practically nonexistent, as most drivers come with the ISO.
Cons
Con Not really free and not available for download in Iran
Con No 32-bit version
Con Gaming can be hit or miss
To run some titles, particularly from Steam, some "massaging" is necessary.
