Safari vs Slimjet

The rendering of the pages and the browser compatibility with OSX works smoothly, when compared to other browsers. Also you get very high battery life with Safari, when compared to Chrome.

– No distraction stuff like favicons in tabs, all that borders, bevels and embosses in panels like in other browsers, no ugly shaped tabs.
– Neat adress bar.
– Good looking start “show all tabs” screen.

Tabs, passwords, bookmarks and, history all sync across devices.

Webkit is very light compared to Blink, renders web pages at an incredible speed, great CSS support and is also constantly evolving.

Lower memory footprint and CPU usage than Chromium.

Supports adding lists in ublock, adblock, adblockplus, and peerblock/peerguardian text formats.

Has advanced settings to reduce web presence footprint.

Multi-threaded streaming download manager with resume functionality. Interrupted downloads will resume when the program is launched again; number of threads and download location customizable on a per-download basis. Actually downloads Linux ISO's from most popular distributions faster than deluge, utorrent, transmission, etc.

Sign in to back up your extensions and settings, just like always.

Just have to dig into all the Settings and disable them starting with SlimJet search.

Optional buttons such as go to home page, reopen closed tab, go to downloads, go to history and many more.

Allows for downloading both video and extracted mp3 audio, a la Youtube2mp3.

You can still bring it with you on a flash drive, even when you're not on Linux.

Button is linked to cookies, so doesn't work if signed out (for security/privacy), and also doesn't include any additional tracking like a browser extension would (Facebook, Amazon, etc.)

Has a setting to unload tabs from RAM and CPU usage after a customizable threshold number of tabs are open built in.

A lot more configuration options for everything from built in "share to facebook" buttons to options meant to enable optimization on low powered/low RAM systems.