When comparing Battlefield 4 vs Pro Evolution Soccer 2017, the Slant community recommends Battlefield 4 for most people. In the question“What are the best LAN party PC games?” Battlefield 4 is ranked 59th while Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 is ranked 123rd. The most important reason people chose Battlefield 4 is:
Each level in the multiplayer section of the game has fully destructible elements, meaning that a certain area of a level can be opened up to new tactics due to a missing structure. This keeps the strategy of each game fully immersive as things can change on the fly.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Immersive destruction that can change gameplay
Each level in the multiplayer section of the game has fully destructible elements, meaning that a certain area of a level can be opened up to new tactics due to a missing structure. This keeps the strategy of each game fully immersive as things can change on the fly.
Pro 64 Players Mode
Pro The goalies feel much more human than the last games in the series
The AI in this game feel very human. In too many games, the AI is nigh unbeatable, because it's a computer doing a human's job. However, PES 2017 has done a remarkable job in making the AI much more realistic.
This is especially noticeable when you're observing the goalies. You can actually fake them out, and do things the way you want to as opposed to having to trick the game's AI to score.
Pro Crazily responsive controls
In so many sports games, there's a significant lag time between pressing your button and your action being performed. This title, however has expertly minimized that lag time, making the game feel much more smooth to play.
Cons
Con Poor writing in campaign mode
The story in the campaign mode is pretty lacking and never fully fleshes out the characters contained within. It can be difficult to care about what is going on, which is a disappointment as there is little reason to continue forward as far as the story is concerned.