When comparing Scoop vs Yarn, the Slant community recommends Scoop for most people. In the question“What are the best Windows package managers?” Scoop is ranked 1st while Yarn is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Scoop is:
Github repo can be found [here](https://github.com/lukesampson/scoop).
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free and Open Source
Github repo can be found here.
Pro Absolutely zero costs
Unlike some competitors, there is no free nor paid version, simply the FLOSS software as it is built.
Pro App installs are independent and self-contained; therefore, they have fewer conflicts and are easier to uninstall
Pro Apps are installed without requiring admin permission
Installing for all users requires admin permissions in order to be secure, so scoop installs without that requiring an elevated command prompt.
Pro App packages install locally (so users can preserve their own environment) or globally
Pro Users can easily create their own apps and collections of apps
Pro Great help available on GitHub Wiki
Pro Good CLI UX
Packages have well-defined, simple names, without any unnecessary duplication, and are actively maintained. If you are used to Homebrew in OSX, you will (almost) feel at home.
Pro Installed packages verified by checksums
Pro Easy to upgrade installed packages
Easy to upgrade installed packages, unlike in Chocolately which makes you pay for upgrade feature.
Pro Customisable selection
If the standard package selection isn't enough for you, you can easily find additional "buckets" that suit your needs. You can also create your own and share them.
See here.
Pro Simple versioning model for dependencies
In Chocolatey, if a package declares dependencies on a bad version of a package, installation or upgrade might break. Scoop dependencies are the latest version of a package, which reduces the chance of things breaking.
Pro Sets reasonable default configuration options for apps
E.g. installing npm configures the global package prefix to your local app folder, and curl includes the Mozilla CA list.
Pro All default packages are portable with a few exceptions
Pro Great selection of apps for programmers and experienced users
Pro Does not clog your Program Files folder
Many installers leave behind a folder in your program files & program files (x86) folder. Since Scoop does not normally touch the folder, there is no problem of clogging it.
Pro Support for ARM64

Pro The same results will be yielded every time yarn is run in a repository
One of the most important aspects of Yarn is determinism (predictability). The lock file ensures that the same dependencies will always be installed in the same way and order regardless of the machine for a given repository.
Pro Can tell you why a package was installed
yarn why <query>
can tell you why a package was installed and what other packages depend on it.

Pro Good network performance
Yarn efficiently queues up requests and avoids request waterfalls in order to maximize network utilization.

Pro Offline mode
If you've installed a package before, you can install it again without any internet connection.

Pro Flat Mode
Resolve mismatching versions of dependencies to a single version to avoid creating duplicates.

Pro Multiple registries
Install any package from either npm or Bower and keep your package workflow the same.

Pro Network resilience
A single request failing won't cause an install to fail. Requests are retried upon failure.

Pro Good documentation
It looks like it has good documentation.
Pro Security is put at the forefront
Even though it's still in its early stages of development, security is one of the core values on which Yarn is built. It uses checksums to verify the integrity of every package before executing its code. This also helps avoiding errors related to faulty caching or captive portals.
Further steps are also being taken to improve the security of Yarn which will be implemented in the future.
Pro Built by the community for the community
Even though it's backed by Facebook, Yarn is built as a community project first and foremost. It's completely open source and hosted on Github. It's released under a standard open source client and has its own GitHub organization and set up to work under the same governance model that other successful projects have used in the past, such as Rust and Ember.
All of this means that both existing and new contributors will always work together to improve the product and introduce new features while also keeping in mind suggestions coming from the community.

Pro Backed by Facebook and Google
Was created in a collaboration of Facebook with Exponent, Google and Tilde.
Cons
Con Has a smaller selection of packages than Chocolatey
While Chocolatey seems to have a huge selection of packages including some windows updates, Scoop has a much smaller selection mainly focused on command-line tools. However, it can be argued that Scoop is focusing on a different type of setup than Chocolatey so package count may not be a good comparison.
Con Doesn't handle orphan packages
Package maintainers can add other needed packages, but if a package gets uninstalled, it doesn't mark other packages as orphans.
(No package relation trees)
Con Takes up disk space
Yarn adds to your disk space usage since it stores dependencies locally.
