Back In Time vs bup
When comparing Back In Time vs bup, the Slant community recommends Back In Time for most people. In the question“What are the best backup programs for Linux?” Back In Time is ranked 1st while bup is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Back In Time is:
Although highly customizable, Back in Time is also suited for people who want an easy tool to use that will back up their data. You can use BiT simply by configuring where to save snapshots, what folders to backup and when to do it.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use
Although highly customizable, Back in Time is also suited for people who want an easy tool to use that will back up their data. You can use BiT simply by configuring where to save snapshots, what folders to backup and when to do it.
Pro Efficient use of storage with file-level deduplication
Pro Highly configurable
Almost all functionality of the program can be customized. It's possible to set when snapshot get removed based on age, available disk space, quantity in a set time period, you can include and exclude files, folders and filetypes, you can defer backups when on battery power, you can ignore errors, you can preserve ACL, extended attributes and so on.
Pro Saves only the minimum amount of data needed
Data is shared between different incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which. Even for backups that come from different computers that know nothing about each other. Bup simply saves the minimal amount of data needed.
Pro Huge files can be backed up incrementally
Bup splits up files into different chunks. This is especially useful for large files which can then be stored without using a lot of disk space for different versions of the same file.
Cons
Con Interface could be more intuitive
The program uses non-labeled, non-intuitive icons and the purpose and functionality of the file browser is not clear at first glance.
Con No GUI
Only available as a command line tool.