Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing VSDC Free Video Editor vs Davinci Resolve, the Slant community recommends Davinci Resolve for most people. In the question“What is the best free video editing software?” Davinci Resolve is ranked 6th while VSDC Free Video Editor is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Davinci Resolve is:
If you like the way that Sony Vegas or Adobe Premiere Pro function, there are built in templates that change the program layout and functionality to match those pieces of software. Even better, you are prompted weather you want to use these on startup so there is no digging through menus to find this feature.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Smooth playback
VSDC Free Video Editor exceeds the standard array of functions required for modest editing goals. Faced with a long video conversion: a 7:30 minute video (a part of which was accelerated at 800%) was exported in 20 minutes.
Pro Feature rich for a free app
Pro Good format support
Most major video and audio formats are supported.
Pro Suprisingly wide choice of video effects and transitions
Pro Good quality export
The only free editor which enables a Full HD export.
Pro Presets for other software
If you like the way that Sony Vegas or Adobe Premiere Pro function, there are built in templates that change the program layout and functionality to match those pieces of software. Even better, you are prompted weather you want to use these on startup so there is no digging through menus to find this feature.
Pro Clean and modern UI
The interface is clean and modern. Providing a nice smooth experience.
Pro Stellar color correcting
The color correcting tools resolve provides are quite powerful
Pro Stable and supported
The software is actively developed on, and is incredibly stable
Pro Has a free version which is only lacking a few features
Cons
Con Interface is not as straightforward as it could be
VSDC exposes a lot of information. And a good amount of that information is non-essential. That results in a slightly cluttered interface that can get in the way of actually editing the material. Similarly, some workflow conventions are dated. For example, cutting a clip needs a separate interface. All of that combined ends in having to learn a lot more about the software before it can be used.
Con Not open source
Con Not traditionally an editing software
While the built in editor is great, the software is mostly focused on color correction.
Con Lacks features
It functions flawlessly as a basic editor, but when you try to get into anything beyond titles, fades, and basic animations, you will likely find the toolset lacking.
Con It can take a bit of time to get used to
Because it is traditionally a color correcting software, getting to the actual editing toolset is a tiny bit difficult.
