When comparing TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging vs Errorception, the Slant community recommends TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript client-side error logging services?” TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging is ranked 1st while Errorception is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging is:
Understanding the console, network, and user events that led up to an error makes it possible to recreate it in development.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Telemetry timeline
Understanding the console, network, and user events that led up to an error makes it possible to recreate it in development.
Pro Error trends
Reports show what are the important errors to focus on fixing.
Pro Wraps console.log for errors
All messages sent into console are included with error messages for additional context and logging.
Pro Realtime notifications
See when new errors are happening in Slack or Hipchat rooms.
Pro Ability to track an error down to a specific customer (if necessary)
TrackJS supports custom user IDs, which can be random strings that we, the customer can assign to a certain user. This helps a lot when handling a support request or a bug report from customers.
Pro Daily summary email
You can see how your site is doing every day with a summary of all the interesting activity and errors that should be checked into.
Pro Engineer Support
You will always get an engineer who can understand and answer your question right away whenever you need help.
Pro Highly customizable with custom JS code on the page
Hooks in the code that let you customize just about anything, you can get the error object before it's sent to the server and do whatever you like with it.
Pro Inline sourcecode snippets
Error messages and stacktraces are shown with snippets of the raw source at the location. This gives a ton of context to quickly find the error.
Pro Powerful ignore rules and grouping rules
To ignore spurious errors.
Pro Find bug in product easily
TrackJs is very useful to catch console errors.
Pro Analytics dashboard
A snapshot of how you are doing, comparing page view volume to error volume.
Pro Very useful product for use and tracking issues
Pro Personal touch customer support
Pro Predictable Billing
No surprise bills caused by changes in usage.
Pro Client specs
Some general information like browser, operating system and viewport used by the client may help to determine source of trouble more precisely.
Pro Extremely high performance
Errorception's script loads incredibly fast on your webpage, without affecting your site's load time at all.
Pro Reasonable pricing
Even though the company offers no free plan, their other plans are quite reasonably priced, with the micro plan starting at just $5 a month and a 500 errors/month quota.
Pro Provides all necessary Error tracking features
Errorception, along with its competitors provides the same vast set of tools, to make your life easier. Features include grouping of errors, noise reduction (caused by misbehaving plugins in client browsers), error filtering and Email alerts as well.
Cons
Con Multiple errors from the same user can bloat your metrics
No "distinct" error count. If a loop ends up inflating a single user's error count, all reports are affected. Dashboard skewed by weird outliers.
Recently (as of February 2018) sorting by "users impacted" was introduced to reduce this problem.
Con No deployments using a REST API call
Con No Free Plan
Even though Errorception does offer a Free (No credit Card required) 30 day trial, the bug tracking service does not offer a Free plan, unlike some of the other services in the list.
