Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Errorception vs CatchJS, the Slant community recommends Errorception for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript client-side error logging services?” Errorception is ranked 10th while CatchJS is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Errorception is:
Errorception's script loads incredibly fast on your webpage, without affecting your site's load time at all.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Extremely high performance
Errorception's script loads incredibly fast on your webpage, without affecting your site's load time at all.
Pro Reasonable pricing
Even though the company offers no free plan, their other plans are quite reasonably priced, with the micro plan starting at just $5 a month and a 500 errors/month quota.
Pro Provides all necessary Error tracking features
Errorception, along with its competitors provides the same vast set of tools, to make your life easier. Features include grouping of errors, noise reduction (caused by misbehaving plugins in client browsers), error filtering and Email alerts as well.
Pro Notifications when things break
Can send emails when new errors happen.
Pro Shows code snippets
Shows code snippets of the error and applies source maps automatically.
Pro Doesn't slow down page loads
Has a very small filesize, so it doesn't slow down page loads.
Pro Screenshots really help debugging
It takes a screenshot of the screen, so you can see what the user was looking at when the error happened.
Cons
Con No Free Plan
Even though Errorception does offer a Free (No credit Card required) 30 day trial, the bug tracking service does not offer a Free plan, unlike some of the other services in the list.
