Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing BitBucket Issue Tracker vs Trac, the Slant community recommends BitBucket Issue Tracker for most people. In the question“What are the best self-hosted bug trackers?” BitBucket Issue Tracker is ranked 12th while Trac is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose BitBucket Issue Tracker is:
You can use BitBucket for free if you have 5 or less users (or try it out for free). Price brackets are for 10, 25, 50, 100, or unlimited users (it costs $1 per user per month, or $200 for unlimited users).
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Free for up to 5 users
You can use BitBucket for free if you have 5 or less users (or try it out for free). Price brackets are for 10, 25, 50, 100, or unlimited users (it costs $1 per user per month, or $200 for unlimited users).
Pro Native application for both Mac and Windows
Atlassian, the company behind BitBucket is also behind SourceTree, a free application for Windows and Mac wich works as a client for both Git and Mercurial which can be connected to BitBucket and other code hosting services.
Pro Supports both Mercurial and Git
Has full support for both Mercurial and Git VCS.
Pro Database support
Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite.
Pro GIT and SVN support
Pro Open source
Written in Python.
Pro Bitnami installer
Bitnami installer available.
Cons
Con Integration with other tools is not as good as github
Most of the 3rd party tools ( bug trackers, CI servers, chat servers, etc) always integrate with GitHub first, and either don't integrate with Bitbucket at all or do sub par job in it. For example there are 3 separate projects to allow building and verifying pull request submissions on Jenkins CI server and there is only one viable one for BitBucket and that one is really buggy and lacking many features.
The only exception to this rule is Atlassian products like Jira.
Con Python
Python can be slow sometimes.
