Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing WordPress vs Statamic, the Slant community recommends WordPress for most people. In the question“What are the best CMS for building a multilingual website?” WordPress is ranked 3rd while Statamic is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose WordPress is:
If you set up WP on your own server, you can change every single aspect of it as you see fit.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Complete control if needed
If you set up WP on your own server, you can change every single aspect of it as you see fit.
Pro Widely used
According to some statistics, WP powers a fifth of the Internet. It means there are resources for everything. Community support, tutorials, extensions and a plethora of customization options.
Pro Self-host & WP-host options
For free WordPress can be hosted by yourself on your own server, or as a subdomain of wordpress.com. You can also pay to use a custom domain with WP hosting.
Pro Open source
Anyone can view the code of WordPress since it's under a libre/open source license.
Pro RSS feeds for everything
Including tags and categories.
Pro Post-level privacy controls
Each post can have a different access level.
Pro Multi-lingual support baked into the core
No need for plugins.
Pro Great support
Since it's a premium product, you have easy access to the devs, either through their Slack channel or through email or the official forums.
Pro Developers have extra incentive to maintain it, considering it's a commercial product
So it keeps the bar high. Provides extra-incentive for the developers to fix bugs and make sure it maintains solid.
Pro Can work as a static site generator
Can be used as a flat-file CMS with the option to wire-up a database if needed.
Pro Great documentation
The documentation is extremely detailed and explains everything thoroughly.
Cons
Con A bit of bloat and complexity
WP has grown past being just a blogging platform and as such it's not as lightweight as it used to be. It also considerably more complex due to many more customization options compared to other solutions.
Con Dated
The code is a mess, uses dated conventions, and relies on dated technology.
Con Not free
Limits adoption. Might not be the best choice for small/no-budget projects.
