Tags
Commonly Compared
Sciter
vs
Review of Sciter powered by the Slant community.
Sciter allows designing an application in a completely platform independent manner. It is free for commercial use, although it is not open-source.
See example for C#.
SpecsUpdate
PlatformsWindows, Linux, Mac
Supported languagesC++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, PowerBuilder
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Multi language
Support for C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, Powerbuilder. See Go bindings on GitHub. The binding for C# on GitHub, SciterSharp does not seem to be free: in a commercial product you should acquire a commercial license.
Pro Lightweight
Only a single native DLL.
Cons
Con Linux version is not very mature
The Linux version is missing HTML/CSS features when compared to the Windows version.
Con Not fully HTML5 compliant
Lacking HTML5 functionality and W3C standards: grabbing a library like JQuery or Bootstrap and use it in Sciter will not work.
Con Not WYSIWYG
Not WYSIWYG like WebForms or WPF.
Commonly Compared
Sciter
vs
