When comparing Fossil SCM vs Silvrback, the Slant community recommends Silvrback for most people. In the question“What are the best solutions for a personal blog?” Silvrback is ranked 16th while Fossil SCM is ranked 28th. The most important reason people chose Silvrback is:
There is no clutter and it's easy to read.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro All in one
While most other platforms allow either online blogging, or development offline and hosting on some other platform, fossil allows you to develop locally, host it locally, view it locally, and you can substitue locally with remote if you want to.
It's just one file. Fossil.
Pro Free
It is. It is also free as in libre, as in the license is similar (or equivilant) to BSD-2
Pro Simple to use
Fossil doesn't depend on a specific language to be present on the target or development system. Just write, commit, and done.
Pro Excellent blog layout
There is no clutter and it's easy to read.
Pro Real-time post preview feature
You can view your end-result right as you're writing.
Pro Markdown support
You can use Markdown syntax to write your articles.
Pro Great user interface
It is intuitive, does not get in the way of writing or reading.
Pro Custom favicon support
Favicon is the icon in the address bar next to the URL. Most places with a subdomain only allow their own icon. Silvrback allows you your own.
Pro Supports custom domains
You can set up and use your own domain name.
Cons
Con You have to do everything manually and know what you're doing
It is similar to the "Writing your own solution" option
Con Image headers have a very awkward size
Lots of time wasted on finding something suitable.
Con No Two Factor authentication
Con No free or ad-supported option
Annual or monthly subscription only.
![Vetted.ai illustration](/images/ai/vetted-illustration.png)