Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariCodea vs Ebitengine
When comparing Codea vs Ebitengine, the Slant community recommends Ebitengine for most people. In the question“What are the best 2D game engines?” Ebitengine is ranked 59th while Codea is ranked 107th. The most important reason people chose Ebitengine is:
One of the core focuses of Ebitengine is to be simple. The screen is just treated as another image that can be drawn to.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Helpful code editor
Errors show up live, as you type. Smarter autocompletion picks up your local and global variables, including nested types. Everything else is just plain smarter, from indentation to highlighting.
Pro Ships with music and sound packs
Codea ships with three great music and sound packs, composed just for Codea and free for you to use in whatever you create.
Pro You can code on an iPad and easily distribute the game
Pro Location library
Location library lets you make use of the GPS inside your iPad. Get your latitude, longitude, altitude and more with a dead-simple API designed specifically for Codea.
Pro Simple
One of the core focuses of Ebitengine is to be simple. The screen is just treated as another image that can be drawn to.
Pro Cross platform
Many platforms are supported, including WebAssembly.
Cons
Con Bare-bones
For example, Ebitengine does not have a physics engine; instead games must rely on a separate implementation such as Chipmunk2D.
