When comparing Seafile vs TeraCopy, the Slant community recommends Seafile for most people. In the question“What are the best personal file-syncing solutions?” Seafile is ranked 6th while TeraCopy is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Seafile is:
Seafile community edition is licensed under GPLv2 with source code available on [GitHub](https://github.com/haiwen/seafile).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free and open source
Seafile community edition is licensed under GPLv2 with source code available on GitHub.
Pro Client-side encryption
All files are transferred with AES 128 bit encryption.
Pro Faster file deletion
It deletes files much much faster than built in Windows file manager.
Pro Can check files for copy errors
TeraCopy can automatically check/verify the copied files for errors, by calculating their CRC or other checksum/hash value.
Pro Seamless shell integration
Pro Skips badly copied files
TeraCopy skips badly copied files during the copying process, and then displays them at the end of the transfer "Verify" with checksum/hash, so you can see which files to re-copy. See also, OpenHashTab for Windows and DeadHash for Windows, Linux, Android.
Cons
Con Requires maintenance
You have to manually keep the server and clients up to date.
Con Sometimes clashes with 7 zip
From my experience, TeraCopy does not do well in conjunction with 7zips.
It seems to error on some systems when you do a drag-and-drop extract.