When comparing Syncthing vs TeraCopy, the Slant community recommends Syncthing for most people. In the question“What are the best personal file-syncing solutions?” Syncthing is ranked 1st while TeraCopy is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Syncthing is:
Licensed under [MIT](https://github.com/calmh/syncthing/blob/master/LICENSE).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free and open-source
Licensed under MIT.
Pro Cross-platform
Available for Linux, OS X and Windows and web.
Pro Works out of the box
Requires no configuration to protect your privacy; it just works.
Pro Reasonably active community forum
Pro Unofficial Android client available
An Android app was created by a third-party.
Pro Faster file deletion
It deletes files much much faster than built in Windows file manager.
Pro Can check files for copy errors
TeraCopy can automatically check/verify the copied files for errors, by calculating their CRC or other checksum/hash value.
Pro Seamless shell integration
Pro Skips badly copied files
TeraCopy skips badly copied files during the copying process, and then displays them at the end of the transfer "Verify" with checksum/hash, so you can see which files to re-copy. See also, OpenHashTab for Windows and DeadHash for Windows, Linux, Android.
Cons
Con In beta
Although mostly stable, such stability is not guaranteed, and support is only community driven. Caution advised.
Con Sometimes clashes with 7 zip
From my experience, TeraCopy does not do well in conjunction with 7zips.
It seems to error on some systems when you do a drag-and-drop extract.