When comparing Firebase vs Pyramid, the Slant community recommends Pyramid for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Pyramid is ranked 15th while Firebase is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Pyramid is:
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro One command deploys and rollbacks
The content is deployed immediately through the Firebase CLI. Once it's uploaded, the content is served immediately. If you have made a mistake, you don't need to re-upload a new version, through the Admin dashboard you can easily rollback to a previous version.
Pro Assured future support
Google acquired Firebase in Oct. 2014. This gives Firebase a degree of trustworthiness in their service and future support since they are backed by such a large company.
Pro Well documented
The documentation and quick start guides are informative and easy to learn.
Pro Very flexible
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Pro Persistence agnostic
Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin).
Pro Comes with security included
Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends.
Cons
Con Hosted
Firebase locks you in to Google's service; you can't run it on your own servers.
Con The great number of options it offers can become intimidating
One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it.