When comparing Seapine TestTrack ALM vs Kwok Information Server, the Slant community recommends Kwok Information Server for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” Kwok Information Server is ranked 9th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Kwok Information Server is:
No client software needed.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool
TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.
Pro Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document
Pro Supports full SCM integration
Pro Supports full Traceability
Pro Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.
Pro Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development
You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.
Pro Web based
No client software needed.
Pro Positive reviews
Positive reviews on SourceForge.
Pro Win, Mac, Linux
Multi platform.
Cons
Con Steep learning curve
TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.
Con Limited
Might be too limited for advanced users, there seems to be no integration with version control systems like GIT or SVN.
