Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Maker.js vs Pixi.js, the Slant community recommends Pixi.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript drawing libraries?” Pixi.js is ranked 12th while Maker.js is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose Pixi.js is:
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
No other questions
Pros
Pro Accurate to at least .001 and beyond in most cases
Most drawing libraries are built for screens / pixels, which only need to be accurate to one decimal place (half a pixel). Maker.js is built for very accurate CAD drawings.
Pro Nested model for drawings to require other drawings
Pro Output formats for CNC and laser cutters
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Cons
No cons yet!
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.