Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
GNU Emacs Lisp vs Hy
When comparing GNU Emacs Lisp vs Hy, the Slant community recommends Hy for most people. In the question“What are the best Lisp dialects?” Hy is ranked 8th while GNU Emacs Lisp is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Hy is:
Hy compiles to Python's abstract syntax trees. Python can import Hy modules, and Hy can import Python modules.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
Pros
Pro If you use Emacs, it's a good language for what it does (better than VimL)
Pro Has lots of uses in Emacs
Pro Python interop
Hy compiles to Python's abstract syntax trees. Python can import Hy modules, and Hy can import Python modules.
Pro Easier to read
Distinguished between arrays (or vectors) and function calls by using [] and (), respectively.
Pro Copyfree and open source
Uses the MIT (expat) license.
Cons
Con Not very useful outside of extending Emacs
Con Very Low-Power Lisp Dialect
Con A strange dialect, outdated dialect
Con Not Copyfree
No cons yet!