When comparing Pixi.js vs Recharts, the Slant community recommends Pixi.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for creating visualisations of data as charts/graphs?” Pixi.js is ranked 14th while Recharts is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Pixi.js is:
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Pro Extensible
This is a fairly extensible library that allows you to add your own components
Pro Beautiful
Charts made with Recharts look great.
Pro Fast
Recharts renders quickly and smoothly.
Cons
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.
Con Depends on ReactJS
This relies upon React.js so if you're not using React, this isn't really an option.
