Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Pixi.js vs AnyChart, the Slant community recommends AnyChart for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for creating visualisations of data as charts/graphs?” AnyChart is ranked 4th while Pixi.js is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose AnyChart is:
xml, json, csv, js api.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Pro A lot of different data formats
xml, json, csv, js api.
Pro Lots of chart types
Including bar, line, area, scatter, waterfall, spline, funnel, bubble, polar, column, columnrange, pie, box plot, angular gauge, areasplinerange, and other types of "basic" charts (AnyChart); Gantt charts (AnyGantt); Maps (AnyMap), and Financial/Stock charts (AnyStock).
Pro Independent from other js libraries
no jQuery or libraries.
Pro IE6+ support, along with mobile browsers
Pro Experienced team and long product history
AnyChart is on the market since 2003.
Pro Events support
Pro Flexibility
Any part of chart can be adjusted.
Pro A lot of integration templates
Technical integration templates for many popular stacks.
Cons
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.
Con Proprietary
Con Expensive
Once you use it on anything but a site, it rapidly gets expensive.
