When comparing Rambox vs Mu4e, the Slant community recommends Mu4e for most people. In the question“What are the best native e-mail clients for Linux?” Mu4e is ranked 10th while Rambox is ranked 17th. The most important reason people chose Mu4e is:
The UI is designed to allow for quick keystrokes to get around and is pretty clean. Header View: ![](http://www.djcbsoftware.nl/code/mu/mu4e-2.png) Message View: ![](http://www.djcbsoftware.nl/code/mu/mu4e-3.png)
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cross-platform
Pro Free and open source
Pro You can add personal webs if it not available in the app store of rambox
Pro A lot of apps
Pro UI optimized for speed
The UI is designed to allow for quick keystrokes to get around and is pretty clean.
Header View:
http://www.djcbsoftware.nl/code/mu/mu4e-2.png
Message View:
Pro Asynchronous
Heavy actions never block emacs, unlike most other emacs email clients.
Pro Fully Search Based
Mu4e has no folders or other organizational tools, rather it relies on very fast search queries to help you find your mail.
Pro Can write rich text emails
Using the (beta) org mode, Mu4e can compose fully rich text emails.
Pro Built-in Autocomplete
Doesn't require you to import address books for autocomplete, learns from your emails just like Gmail.